No. 21-8200
Daniel Louis Jackson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: fourth-amendment ineffective-assistance kimmelman-v-morrison privacy-rights probable-cause search-and-seizure standing strickland-v-washington warrant-particularity
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy
HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER COUNSEL PROVIDED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE FOR FAILING TO FILE A MERITORIOUS MOTION TO SUPPRESS
WHETHER SHERIFF LECLERE'S AFFIDAVIT SHOWED SUFFICIENT PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE ARREST FOR JACKSON
WHETHER THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE OF JACKSON'S FACEBOOK WAS GENERAL, OVERBROAD, UNREASONABLE, AND INFRINGED HIS RIGHT TO PRIVACY
WHETHER THE SEARCH WARRANT FOR JACKSON'S CELL PHONE VIOLATED THE FOURTH AMENDMENT UNDER THE PARTICULARITY REQUIREMENT
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-counsel-provided-ineffective-assistance-for-failing-to-file-a-meritorious-motion-to-suppress
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-06-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2022)
Attorneys
Daniel Jackson
Daniel Louis Jackson — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent