No. 21-8197
Michael James Bosman v. United States
Tags: alternatives criminal-procedure fourth-amendment law-enforcement-conduct police-conduct precedent probable-cause reasonableness reasonableness-standard search-and-seizure seizure
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Tenth Circuit misapply this Court's precedent, and wrongly reject Mr. Bosman's Fourth Amendment claim, when it dismissed the availability of an obvious and readily available alternative to the gunpoint seizure, without considering whether the police acted unreasonably in failing to recognize or pursue that alternative?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Tenth Circuit misapply this Court's precedent, and wrongly reject Mr. Bosman's Fourth-Amendment-claim, when it dismissed the availability of an obvious-and-readily-available-alternative to the gunpoint-seizure, without considering whether the police-acted-unreasonably in failing to recognize or pursue that alternative?
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-06-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2022)
2022-05-06
Application (21A690) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until June 20, 2022.
2022-05-04
Application (21A690) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 19, 2022 to June 20, 2022, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Michael Bosman
Howard A. Pincus — Fed Pub. Def. for Dist. CO &WY, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent