1. WHETHER The United States Court of Appeals in The Eighth Circuit ERR IN NOT FINDING THAT KELLY HAD A RIGHT TO HAVE THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF POST- CONVICTION COUNSEL DURING KELLYS INITIAL APPEAL IN VIOLATION OF KELLY 'S 5th, 6th, AND 14™ AMENDANTS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?

2. WHETHER The United States Court of Appeals in the Eighth Circuit ERR IN NOT FINDING THAT KELLY 'S MANDATED SENTENCE IS DISPROPORTIONATE TO HIS UNDERLYING OFFENSE OF THIRD DEGREE SEXUAL ABUSE A NONMANDATED SENTENCE?

3. WHETHER The United States Court of Appeals in The Eighth Circuit ERR IN NOT FINDING KELLY 'S PLEA COLLOQUY VIOLATED I.R.C. 2.8 AND 2.8(2)(d)?

4. WHETHER The United States Court of Appeals in The Eighth Circuit ERR IN NOT FINDING THAT KELLY 'S SENTENCE VIOLATES THE EX POST FACTO CLAUSE OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND CONSTITUITON OF IOWA, AS HIS CRIME WAS COMMITTED PRIOR TO THE JULY 1, 2005 ENACTMENT OF CODE OF IOWA 903B.1 STATUTE?

whether-effective-assistance-of-counsel-was-denied