1. In 12 U.S.C. § 1735f-15( e), Congress authorized
federal Courts of Appeals to take direct review of the
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development'simposition of civil monetary penalties along with "suchancillary issues" as may be raised at the administrativelevel. Given that scope of review, may the Court ofAppeals nonetheless refuse to consider constitutionalissues that were raised at the administrative level?

Whether the Court of Appeals may refuse to consider constitutional issues raised at the administrative level when reviewing the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development's imposition of civil monetary penalties under 12 U.S.C. § 1735f-15(e)