I. Jury Misconduct
In applying 28 USC § 2254 (d)(1)(2.), both the state Courts' and Federal Courts' decisions were based on an unreasonable determination of the facts that jurors prejudged the petitioner and the case presented in the state Court proceeding. Thus, it deluded petitioner's right of U.S. Constitution of 7th Amendment.

II. Prosecution Misconduct And Corruption
In applying 28 USC § 2254 (d)(1)(i), both state courts' and Federal Courts' judges' decisions were based on an unreasonable determination of the facts that prosecution purposely, professionally and deliberately falsified Murder-linked cases and fabricated petitioner's federal health test result (AMP II) presented in the state Court proceeding. Thus, it violated petitioner's right of U.S Constitution of 5th and 14th Amendment. It is of utmost prosecution fabrication send final stop to stop and correct it nationwide. In Optional Case nation D.ct. This Court has the Corr.

III. Ineffective Assistance of Defense Counsel
In applying 28 USC § 2254 (d)(2.), both state courts' and Federal courts' decisions were based on an unreasonable determination of the facts that case before the trial court and the defense counsel failed to prepare the Strike and rebut the prosecution's fabrication and corruption, and failed to effectively defense the petitioner presented in the state Court proceeding. Thus, it violated petitioner's right of U.S Constitution of 6th Amendment.

Jury-Misconduct