No. 21-8171
Lamar Keith Garvin v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing defendant-characteristics due-process judicial-discretion sentencing sentencing-disparities sentencing-guidelines sentencing-range sentencing-variance
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Securities
HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether the Fourth Circuit erred by affirming the District Court's imposing an unreasonable sentence under the totality of the circumstances, and whether Mr. Garvin's sentence should be reversed and remanded?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court abused its discretion in not granting the defendant a variance sentence
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-06-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 18, 2022)
Attorneys
Lamar Garvin
Peter L. Goldman — Saboura, Goldman & Colombo, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent