No. 21-8169

Ghassan Hage v. Fida Mhanna

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2022-06-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights default-judgment due-process due-process-violation family-law fraud fraud-upon-court judicial-abuse-of-discretion judicial-misconduct legal-ethics
Key Terms:
Takings
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

(l) Where Fraud upon the Court became normal in Family Justice Center in Santa Clara county, Department 76 when a lawyer committed numerous count of Fraud and a Judge of the Superior Court allowed them, (2) where corruption in Family Justice center in Santa Clara County is much more powerful than the Justice, (3) when the Judge of the Superior Court abused his power to cover up the Fraud upon the Court committed by a lawyer, (4) where Judge and lawyer in the Superior Court set a trial date on a day when both were notified that the petitioner was not available for a trial, (5) where Judge of the Superior Court abused his authority and discretion and issued a default judgment with falsified lawyer hourly fees when petitioner was not available with a Good cause (Appendix "B" p. 34a ), (6) where Lawyer violated State Bar of California Rule 5-200 and the ethic codes by misleading the Court in providing untruthful Declaration of his fees (Appendix "F", "G", "H", "I", and "J") and let the Judge to bless the fraud by making wrong decision in lawyer fee payments, under what circumstances do a Judge and a lawyer can be above the Law in the Superior Court of California while the Sixth Appellate Court of California turned its blind eye on this double violations of the Law by the Judge and the lawyer in a conspiracy way. (7) When a presiding Judge of the Superior Court abused her power and blocked the petitioner to file a motion to change the Court trial date due to his unavailability with a good cause. (8) When a lawyer modified a Court Order provisions putting petitioner 's kids at risk without proper process and without communicating with the petitioner (Appendix "M" p. 79a ) and got an award of $5000 for violating the law, petitioner took him 20 months to restore the provisions as they were(Appendix "N" p. 81a ) (9) When the CA Supreme Court turned its blind eye too on this violation of the LAW by the Judge and the Lawyer.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Where Fraud upon the Court became normal in Family Justice Center in Santa Clara county, Department 76 when a lawyer committed numerous count of Fraud and a Judge of the Superior Court allowed them

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-03-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 18, 2022)

Attorneys

Ghassan Hage
Ghassan Hage — Petitioner