No. 21-8161

Onofre Tommy Serrano v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-06-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 42-usc-1443 civil-rights civil-rights-removal criminal-prosecution due-process equal-protection federal-defense federal-jurisdiction federal-removal jurisdiction removal statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Does berg derled equol civl Rights on the basis
fOR REMOU pRSANt tO 28 USC & 1443(1)?

2. CaN A CRimIrAl stote cASE be RemovEd puRsJANt tO
28 USC & 3Ci where A petitoreR only Alleges A deel
of A federol strtute
prouding for equsl civil rights
As A federal defense?

3. Does 28 UsC & 1943(1) mandote thot petrtONER
Refererce A stote stotute oR A constitutorl pouision
that porports to commard the stte corts to igwore
the Federsl Rights?

4. Wheter the lourt's supeusory power shord be
exerased is and of its exesting statutory jurisdiction
with RegARd to stote cRinNal posecutioN's Removed
puRSuEt to 28 USC 1MBCi) fOR piRposes of Ioking
A Federol defense?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does besa domed equal cunt 2) airts oO» the basis of gelato { colae pursuant t> UL USC ¢ 20004{4) quelily foe Removel pubs tnt to 12 USC & \\443 0?

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-06-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 18, 2022)

Attorneys

Onofre Tommy Serrano
Onofre Tommy Serrano — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent