No. 21-8160
Jamie M. Coffey v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment appeal appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process griffith-v-kentucky judicial-precedent retroactive-application retroactivity
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus Securities
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Do the State and Federal courts violate a petitioner's 14th Amendment Right to due process when they decline to apply a new rule governing a criminal procedure retroactively to a case pending on appeal contrary to this Court's holding in Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314,315,107 S.Ct. 708, 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Do the State and Federal courts violate a petitioner's 14th Amendment Right to due process when they decline to apply a new rule governing a criminal procedure retroactively to a case pending on appeal contrary to this Court's holding in Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 315, 107 S.Ct. 708, 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987)?
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 18, 2022)
2022-05-16
Application (21A719) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until June 16, 2022.
2022-05-06
Application (21A719) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 17, 2022 to July 16, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Jamie M. Coffey
Jamie M. Coffey — Petitioner