No. 21-8151
Eric X. Rambert v. District Attorney of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, et al.
IFP
Tags: career-criminal civil-action civil-procedure civil-rights classification due-process false-imprisonment fraud judicial-review legal-relief lower-court-error standing
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Lower Court Err in dismissing Appellant's Civil Action For Lack of Standing or a Claim For which Relief May be granted? yes.
Did the Lower Court Err in denying the Appellant University Classified a Career Grant on the basis that it was tried on Correctional Experience in his Career Commitment Form, as a Career Criminal Even though he was a Returning and meet the theory to Please Opent? yes.
Did the lower Court Err in dismissing Appellant's Lawsuit for Failing to Allege on a meritorious and on lawful Reason? yes.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Lower Court Err in dismissing Appellants Civil Action for a lack of Stating a Claim for which Relief May be Granted?
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-07-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 18, 2022)
Attorneys
Eric X. Rambert
Eric X. Rambert — Petitioner