No. 21-8139

Duenta Grier v. Georgia

Lower Court: Georgia
Docketed: 2022-06-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: availability confrontation-clause constitutional-rights criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process government-agent minors testimonial-hearsay witness-availability
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

Was the Confrontation Clause violated when the State presented testimonial hearsay consisting of out-of-court statements to a government agent allegedly made by two minors when one of them did not testify at trial and the other proved incapable of testifying at trial?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was the Confrontation Clause violated?

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-15
Waiver of right of respondent State of Georgia to respond filed.
2022-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 14, 2022)

Attorneys

Duenta Grier
Edward H. Wasmuth Jr.Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP, Petitioner
State of Georgia
Stephen John PetranyGeorgia Department of Law, Respondent