X emn injury selection rebuffed In seating <X laiASftJ ijuror, or<de/>r,v<dlffn <rf the naa/»dcjclecl nw/nber peresnptdfy c.V>ftlle/^ex should have keen reviewed under- the Jwe phc&rr^ *PP^ ^ ^ sUldU^een Wughhnd Jet) jcd , s-<xl4 standard r^ulri'/y -file remedy o')* f-eVeAsvd.

Whether errors in jury selection resulted in seating a biased juror, or deprivation of the mandated number of peremptory challenges should have been reviewed under the due process standard that applied when appeal should have been brought and decided, said standard beginning at the remedy of reversal