Was Jurdi's counsel ineffective for failing to object to, and thereby preserve for appeal, the fact that the government intended to use a non-qualifying prior offense to enhance his sentence?

Was Jurdi's counsel ineffective for his failure to request that the district court question the jurors concerning apparent premature deliberations? And for counsel's failure to request a specific and direct admonishment to the jury that it should refrain from deliberations - absolutely - until it was instructed to begin by the Court?

Was Jurdi's counsel ineffective for his failure to object to the prosecutor's knowing use of false evidence by Anthony Grasso?

Was Brent's counsel ineffective for failing to object to, and thereby preserve for review, the government-intended use of a novel, self-incriminating process of refusal to answer his sentence?