Ron Delano Kuntz v. United States
1. Whether a conflict arises, thereby compelling federal courts to follow Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980), when trial counsel's concurrent representation occurs during critical stages of the district court proceedings, but ends prior to trial.
2. Whether the District Court's imposition of a sentence enhancement not found by the jury violates Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013), thereby making summary reversal appropriate.
3. Whether the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial is violated when a trial court instructs the jury that "interference with commerce by robbery is a crime of violence" in a case where neither the Indictment nor the final instructions to the jury specify the underlying theory of the crime of violence.
Whether a conflict arises when trial counsel's concurrent representation ends prior to trial