Whether the Ninth Circuit's rule in Villavicencio-Burruel, which requires that a prior conviction under California Penal Code § 245(a)(1) constitute a "crime of violence" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), based on the categorical approach and the residual clause, contradicts subsequent decisions of this Court and creates a circuit split that warrants this Court's review and reversal.

Whether a crime that is not a violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act can serve as a predicate offense for purposes of the Act's sentencing enhancement