1. Whether an unaddressed constitutional claim not affirmatively contradicted by the record deserves relief, and if so, should review under Due process clause guarantee an evidentiary hearing?

2. Whether the now properly interpreted elements of 8922(g) and 8924(a)(2) as clarified in Rehaif, require correction under Due process because petitioner's exercised right to a fair trial at a reasonable doubt, violates both the 5th amendment Due process and 6th amendment right to a fair trial?

3. Whether the vagueness doctrine extends to the 18 USCS 8924(c)(1)(A)'s language of "in furtherance of", as it fails to give notice of what element or conduct is required to violate the statute, violates Due process?

Whether an unaddressed Constitutional claim not affirmatively contradicted by the record deserves review, and if so, should review under Due Process Clause guarantee an evidentiary hearing?