No. 21-8026
William F. Kaetz v. Educational Credit Management Corporation, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: bankruptcy bankruptcy-law constitutional-vagueness due-process fifth-amendment first-amendment standing statutory-interpretation takings vagueness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-11-04
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is the statute 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(8) void for vagueness therefore unconstitutional?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the statute 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(8) void for vagueness therefore unconstitutional?
Docket Entries
2022-11-07
Rehearing DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-10-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
2022-10-11
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent Trans Union, LLC to respond filed.
2022-05-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2022)
Attorneys
Trans Union, LLC
Camille Renee Nicodemus — Schuckit & Associates, P.C., Respondent
William Kaetz
William F. Kaetz — Petitioner