Levelt Dewarren Musgraves v. Wisconsin
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
1. The Wisconsin state courts did not conduct a complete round of the Public
Interest Justice Initiative (PIJI) sentencing issue presented before the
Milwaukee county circuit court which refuses to address the issue.
2. The state of Wisconsin has attached and established that PIJI as a sentencing
matter to be conducted "not unlike" the individualized nature of sentencing
in Wisconsin.
3. The PIJI is a sentencing modification program for parole eligible juvenile
lifers sentenced in the 1990's, but there is no law or policy within authority
of the state of Wisconsin's highest court; no legislative intent or legislation
and the program contains non-disclosure, violation of equal protection, and
discrimination within a suspect class of the juvenile lifers sentenced in the
1990's.
4. The Wisconsin state courts decision are an unreasonable application of
clearly established federal law as determined by the United States Supreme
Court, and is also contrary to it's own state precedent.
Whether the Wisconsin state courts failed to conduct a complete review of the Public Interest Justice Initiative (PIJI) sentencing issue, and whether the PIJI program lacks legal authority and violates equal protection and non-disclosure rights of juvenile lifers