No. 21-8018

Ramon Ortiz Perez v. Giselle Matteson, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-06-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: court-appointed-counsel criminal-procedure exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment habeas-corpus in-forma-pauperis ninth-circuit search-and-seizure standing supreme-court-rules writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference: 2022-06-23
Question Presented (from Petition)

Question not identified.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in affirming the district court's denial of petitioner's motion to suppress evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment

Docket Entries

2022-06-27
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-06-01
Waiver of right of respondent Giselle Matteson to respond filed.
Main Document
2022-05-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2022)
PetitionPetitionPetition
2022-05-06
Application (21A691) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until June 13, 2022.
2022-04-29
Application (21A691) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 12, 2022 to June 13, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Main DocumentProof of Service

Attorneys

Giselle Matteson
Gregory A. Ott — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Ramon Ortiz Perez
Randy Perry Baker — Randy Baker, Attorney at Law, Petitioner