No. 21-8008

In Re James Martin Graham

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2022-06-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: criminal-jurisdiction criminal-procedure due-process federalism fifth-amendment habeas-corpus subject-matter-jurisdiction tenth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-06-23
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the complaint/information or indictment fail to charge an ONE:
offense againse the laws ofthe United States, because no jurisdiction has
been ceded or accepted over the place where Hr. Graham*s alleged criminal
activity is alleged to have occurred?

Was the trial Court without subject-matter jurisdiction under TWO:
18 U.S.C. § 3231?

Did the criminal statute that Mr. Graham allegedly violated exceed
the power of Congress as applied to defendant/pstitioner*s Due Process Rights
secured by the Fifth Amendment, encroach on the sovereignty and jurisdiction
of the Union state of Georgia violate the Tenth Amendmant and the findamental
principles of"Federalism?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the indictment fail to charge an offense against the laws of the United States, because no jurisdiction has been ceded or accepted over the place where Mr. Graham's alleged criminal activity is alleged to have occurred?

Docket Entries

2022-06-27
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-05-23
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

In Re James Martin Graham
James Martin Graham — Petitioner