1. Whether whistleblower provision of the 2013
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)
protects employees from retaliation occurring
after the provision's effective date, when some of
the protected activities occurred prior to that
effective date.

2. Whether a jury could find it reasonable for a
whistleblower to believe that the employer's inhouse attorney is a "management official or
other employee … who has the responsibility to
investigate, discover, or address misconduct." 41
U.S.C. § 4712(a)(2)(G).

3. Whether the lower courts' failure to address
issues raised by Petitioner precludes summary
judgment.

Whether whistleblower provision of the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) protects employees from retaliation occurring after the provision's effective date, when some of the protected activities occurred prior to that effective date