No. 21-7977
Jason Albert Halda v. Wisconsin
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-resentencing criminal-sentencing disproportionality eighth-amendment juvenile-offenders juvenile-sentencing miller-montgomery-rule miller-v-alabama montgomery-v-louisiana proportionality-review sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration Patent
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration Patent
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Is Jason Halda entitled to a resentencing because the judge imposed sentences long before
the Court's rulings in Miller and Montgomery. Therefore, the sentencing judge could not be
guided by those decisions?
2. Does Jason Halda 's sentence involve the high probability of disproportionality because he
was sentenced pre-dated this Court's decision in Roper, Graham, Miller, and Montgomery
and never received a Miller compliant sentencing hearing?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is Jason Halda entitled to a resentencing?
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-24
Waiver of right of respondent State of Wisconsin to respond filed.
2022-05-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 27, 2022)
Attorneys
Jason Albert Halda
Jason Albert Halda — Petitioner
State of Wisconsin
Anne C Murphy — Department of Justice - Criminal Appeals Unit, Respondent