No. 21-7966
Michael G. Peters v. David Hittner, Judge
Tags: abuse-of-power civil-rights constitutional-rights cover-up due-process free-speech government-misconduct obstruction-of-justice political-cover-up
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
SHOULD FEDERAL JUDGES BE ALLOWED TO COVER-UP FOR EACH OTHER TO PREVENT THE DUE COURSE OF JUSTICE?
2. IS IT ETHICAL FOR JUDGES INGRAINED IN THE SAME COURTHOUSE TO COVER-UP FOR EACH OTHERS INVOLVEMENT IN CORPORATE COVER-UPS, COLLUSION AND TAKE TOKING BRIBES.
3. CAN FEDERAL JUDGES IMPOSE THE GRIER STRIKES PROVISION TO SILENCE THE TRUTH EXPOSING HIS TO MALJUDICIAL AND CORPORATE CRIMES JUST BECAUSE THEY THEMSELVES ARE INVOLVED BRIBES? WITH COVER-UP FOR THEM.
4. ARE FEDERAL JUDGES SUPPOSED TO BE INVOLVED IN COVERING-UP POLITICAL AND CORPORATE CRIMES.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the government's cover-up of evidence and obstruction of justice to prevent the due process of science violates the Constitution
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-05-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 24, 2022)
Attorneys
Michael G. Peters
Michael G. Peters — Petitioner