APPellovrV's Cov^feSSiov^ Adw*:i<iUle 5\v\ce H WcxS boAed
illegal po^ce "tcxc+iCS?Ur\

^ Wouj<J £>. d>ff e^ev-rf V^vdiCrf hir-e^cloed^ ln<X(l "fRe j|le0<>^/Leev^ aV€
Jo);ci4ei evidence vxrV be«^ Co^sidere<4 ?

R;gK Cour+ +o cxdire5S -+-|n ^ Xs +he *Hv*e ir»pe fov
V\oia.+ i
pUr5ua-^4 + o OLY wV\r<*v^A
offev^ Viol^eJ uv-de\r -fbe diSguiS-e<i +ocV*cs of +be f^vvxxjS- ^pevk^s
Opero^ov-^^ j wloi.cU ou*" Supreme Courf Ju54 ;ce£- Lfu Co-e|kxr
;sf fVv>d- \\ be- odd reused lour e ov*nS+ova4
Tv^clud f'u^J^-v^evrbal V»§Wks 3 P e^^SO^evS of \ ©v-%our
cx^d Co'^$*fi*Vu4- ^0^ wKrcVi £>- V-Vo-r e 4oo
ir*5

Was Appellant's Confession Admissible Since He Was Coerced by Illegal Police Tactics?