No. 21-7962
Jimmie Spratt v. Timothy Hooper, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure direct-appeal district-court due-process fifth-circuit judicial-review lozada-precedent lozada-v-deeds
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision that a certificate of appealability is not warranted is in irreconcilable conflict with this Court's decision in Lozada v. Deeds, 498 U.S. 430 (1991). This is important because it deprives the Petitioner of a direct appeal from the district court.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying a certificate of appealability, which deprives the petitioner of a direct appeal from the district court
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-23
Waiver of right of respondent Tim Hooper to respond filed.
2022-04-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 23, 2022)
Attorneys
Jimmie Spratt
Jimmie Spratt — Petitioner
Tim Hooper
Shae Gary McPhee Jr. — Louisiana Department of Justice, Respondent