No. 21-7959
Salito Marques Good v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing double-jeopardy due-process fourth-circuit johnson-precedent sentencing-maximum statutory-interpretation statutory-maximum supervised-release
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-06-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
(1) Whether a defendant can be required to serve more than the statutory maximum sentence for his offense of conviction when a sentence for violating the terms of supervised release is imposed after the defendant has served in excess of the statutory maximum for the underlying offense.
(2) Whether a defendant who is sentenced to a total term in excess of the statutory maximum sentence can raise an objection to the sentence at a supervised release hearing when that hearing is the first practical opportunity to challenge the total sentence.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant can be required to serve more than the statutory maximum sentence for his offense of conviction
Docket Entries
2022-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/16/2022.
2022-05-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-05-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 23, 2022)
Attorneys
Salito Marques Good
Thomas Kieran Maher — Law Offices of Amos Tyndall, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent