No. 21-7945

Nathan B. Byerly v. Idaho, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-05-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech standing takings
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) Shall Supreme Court allow holding for cert as strikeout stage nara Perce while a Case is still app orpetadtyy revyed beerodauk~

2) Orders ison) willwews way Fwd oe Cadi norcenctulons Gus F

3) Snail a potion Rostdeut/Ottizen [Sippect PUNEDAATES be dowted Wert Bry te Rey Cont Gos tr advance *

4) where Coe already Orhere) Gos tobe pal) Inceo mek Me, % S Nok pound by fUe Deynsd Treaty de Haumction WKY GAWED NARLONS ef Uptuetsal NecGeeetou a bumads RIGHTS, Where tote Rights ere

5) Bol Supreme Cont allow Coptom aud or Pructine dM Remolely Herd " preceeddays ob Courts witiek Wn-peron appearunce aut buitrawt the esp 258 prler Consent Party cs) Rusreto 2

6) Shall Argretre Cort rom Gune Third Barty Conbrck Ve aber ot STAVE operted GunimiWicrdions eractites Hut resutiiin "dropped calls,

7) Shall Srpredre Crit allow reid, of YCoriit le Starey [Diets atier ey douse proyjdes Spek Sree ot Age trey Wetenteryed WI ose Recess ts Comvts wile detatned in Shhh UBbedy Laced a Danzer ly Costediaus 2

8) pet ae? Nee Rigas a Fin dawerdal Gvaroufess Ctytt Rtg <

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the legal issues being raised

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2021-11-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 22, 2022)

Attorneys

Nathan Byerly
Nathan B. Byerly — Petitioner