No. 21-7932
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process florida-constitution judicial-jurisdiction jurisdiction mandate trial-court-authority
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT WAS WITHOUT
JURISDICTION TO ENTER AN ORDER REINSTATING THE
PREVIOUS ORDER VACATING OFFENSE UNDER DOUBLE
JEOPARDY PRINCIPLE DESPITE MANDATE FROM DCA; WHERE
THE STATE DID NOT APPEAL THE INITIAL ORDER VACATING
THE OFFENCE AND THE JUDICIAL LABOR HAS COME TO AN
END; THUS VIOLATING APPELLANT 'S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS
UNDER THE UNITES STATES CONSTITUTION AND ARTICLE 1,
SECTION 9, OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial court was without jurisdiction to enter an order reinstating the previous order vacating offense under double jeopardy principle despite mandate from DCA
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-05-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2022)
Attorneys
Sameer Muhammad
Sameer Muhammad — Petitioner