Whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that petitioner's constitutional claims were barred by the statute of limitations, and whether petitioner is entitled to equitable tolling or equitable estoppel to avoid the bar of the statute of limitations.

Whether it is constitutional for the respondent to place a lien against petitioner's property without providing notice and an opportunity to be heard in court.

Whether a is ever constitutionally permissible to hold a defendant in contempt of court based on past conviction of evidence.

Whether it is constitutional to enforce a judgment against petitioner or to proceed on June issues costs.

Whether Tre ond or mOpeeals OMornens Can on there on waive Structreal deCect as relates te Wrased, pre yudical vinackhve judoye and in the Course of doing. So hemsetves doing . rave ae 7 absartela wothing TO hely me cumourcts te