Lamar Reese v. Richard Bowen, Warden
X stipulated into a polygraph polygraph results S'housed Obv/ouS error and did not Comp /y Jurth Ohio e V ' dence Rule fOSL (c) . But th&re ouas no Objection -ho it at trial. X missed ft and mu Attorney missed it. Also X have evidence, that X have tbhiD diagnoses' sin ad x cuas akid . xt Somt one miss a error does that make a, error rightoues ? xt Someone dent get caught sweating does that make, rh rightoues?
Also x presented the error on Direct Appeal as plain e,rror and Seri- a Copy "ho 'the -trial CourtX Fought it all the uuay to the Federal Court. My tight to a Fair Trial is a Constitutional right ? e , .
This polygraph Test- shouuecf obvious error. The polygraph exammters asked me am X acrtizen at Canada and X said yes, But the ansoudr cuas Found non deceptive , But it is obvious X am a citizen at U.S.A. Xs this a obvious error? The Tory uu«s Mis lead . Xs this not a Fair Trial ?
Whether the failure to object to the admission of a polygraph examination that contained obvious errors deprived the defendant of a fair trial