Why did Ashton Rodriguez $ Zachary smith ofte Palestine Police Dept. aCt Under color ofstate law, custom, or usAge, subjeets qnother to the depriation of any rights, Privieges or immunities secvred byfhe Federal Constitustion.

THE COURT REVEEWS THE OBJEETZONS TO THE REPORT DOC2O WHY DID THE COURT REVIEW THE OBJECTZONS-TO PORTION OF A MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT DE NOVO, AND NOT IN A FULL REVIEW?

WHY Id THE Sth CIrCUI+ COURT OF APPEALS DENY MY IN A TIMELY FASHION MIGHT I AD THAT AT THAT TIME THE PANTIFF WAS INCARGOURRATED AND IS LIMITES TO ACCESS OR FREEDOM TO MAILING HES OUN MAIL THE PLANTTFF CAN ", 61, ONLY DO SO MULH IN TAT POSITION DOE TO THE PANDEMIC THAT'S GOING ON ThE MAIL SOMETIMES DEVAY.

Whether the plaintiffs' claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for deprivation of their constitutional rights were improperly dismissed