11. Whether his Court Will Certify that A Manifert has been Cireumvented by the lower injustice disregarded by the Appelliate Also been Courts and rulings LL Structural BrnDr Courts of this Court on internal False From publication;outlined defect ) An The Gustodial Computer data bare" Contrary to in the Filed! Constituted yo miof Driginal Changer A deadly Weapon" the gun "documented Fraud to-wit: on Custodial Criminal records For 47-year And Counting. Rule 19 (2). Which needs to be Certified. punsuant to Conrect the injustice under internal Stucturalerrot" to ") L( Which Allowed the FAlre Publication, ete. .. And this Malicious Controversy. See 28 4.8.C. 51254(2).

2). BecAuse the Eleventh Cinauit Court of Appeal. has overlbosked A true Manifert injustice" spparent on the Face of the recond Which direct and express inl.S. v. 5g "The Court labeled this Category 2d 508 (1993)I Cholding St? AF of errors As Citina

3. No Caurt har or held Stated An examination Facts 1 Any 0 Fled in the petitions haberr Corpuns previous by Whit; And Such, Clearly 10√ have denied A5 petitioner due process of lAW the And equAl thereoFiConty to Constitutional provisions. protection evidentiAry

4). Thus, Thene hAS As Never been Any Findingr Contrary, disclosing to a4+$ Stated Facts of the "Eabe Publication"; this the entitier dictates Claim Meritoriour on its Face for Correcters remains This Count Held; "A Stmctural error in A Criminal proceeding ontrisl 2 1 5 Alwayr requires revernal of A Conviction or Claimed defect of Such, because Such error renders error Vehicle For the determinstion the tril An unreliable of guilt."[Rose v. Clark, 478 U.S. 570,577-78,106 9.CF. 3101, 3105-06,92 L.Ed.2d 460(1986)]; A/s0, "Governmental Misconduct Which Violater Consitutionad 6 Defendant of requires the diomiosl rights A 2) [Andenson Stste 574 So.ad of Criminal y V. (FlA.1991)): 87,92 93 S.Ct. 1637, 36 L.Ed. 2.366 (19735]: Which APDEArS to be in Conflict neliefsnd review Sought.

Whether Thin Court Will Cobh, Hat 2 Mant Peet injudiiee. has heen Crrtumven%e d by The lower Courts and Also been diste garde d by The Appellate | Courts