Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether Snepp should be overruled because it applied mere "reasonableness" scrutiny to an agency's prepublication review regime, and failed to require the substantive and procedural safeguards the Court has demanded in all other contexts involving the licensing of speech.
2. Alternatively, whether Snepp should be clarified because lower courts, including the Fourth Circuit in this case, have read it to preclude any meaningful scrutiny of prepublication review regimes under the First Amendment.
3. Whether Respondents' prepublication review regimes, which lack essential substantive and procedural safeguards, are constitutional.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Snepp should be overruled because it applied mere 'reasonableness' scrutiny to an agency's prepublication review regime, and failed to require the substantive and procedural safeguards the Court has demanded in all other contexts involving the licensing of speech
2022-05-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022.
2022-05-02
Reply of petitioners Timothy H. Edgar, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2022-04-18
Brief of respondents Avril D. Haines, in her official capacity as Director of National Intelligence, et al. in opposition filed.
2022-02-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 18, 2022.
2022-02-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 28, 2022 to April 18, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-01-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 28, 2022.
2022-01-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 28, 2022 to February 28, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-12-29
Brief amici curiae of Professor Jack Goldsmith and Professor Oona A. Hathaway filed.
2021-12-29
Brief amici curiae of Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and Nine Media Organizations filed.
2021-12-23
Brief amici curiae of Former National Security Officials filed.
2021-12-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 28, 2022.
2021-12-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 29, 2021 to January 28, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-11-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 29, 2021)