1) EVERY Supreme Court Justice - currently seated, MUST have an
Appointment Affidavit AND to have taken the/an Oath of Office to
defend/uphold the Constitution. If you DO NOT HAVE BOTH OF THESE
Constitutionally required documents, you CANNOT become a civil
can an individual who DOES servant/Supreme Court Justice, Therefore,
NOT HAVE an Appointment Affidavit AND HAS NOT taken the/an Oath of
Office, become a civil servant/assistant United States attorney
(AUSA) for the government? And if not, are
duties previously performed, WITHOUT THESE DOCUMENTS and/or in
that capacity, Constitutionally/legally valid?ANY of the actions/job

2) Did the lower court(s) abuse its/their discretion and/or violate
the plain, concise, express language that Congress placed in Fed.R.
Evid. (FRE) Rule 201, when the court(s) failed/refused to take
judicial notice of adjudicative facts/documents, when petitioner:
A) requested the court(s) to take judicial notice; B) supplied the
court(s) with the necessary information - facts/documents, and then
the USDC's recharacterization of his FRE 201 into a second/successive
§2255?

3) Did the United States Court of Appeals (USCA) abuse its discretion
when it refused to accept Petitioner's motion to file out-of-time
Fed.R.App.P (FRAP) Rule 40 [21-10088], and motion for an extention
of time to file a FRAP 40 [20-11242], when the USCA denied his
Application for a Certificate of Appealability (C0A) on November
24, 2021, but petitioner did not receive the denials until December
29, 2021, and was unable to send in his FRAP 40: 21-10088 and
motion for extention of time, until January 10, 2022 - due to: i)
this prison's "modified lockdown" due to C0VID-19 and ii) his "unit
teams" absolute refusal to make copies of these court documents? And
when the 45th day was also January 10, 2022 - pursuant to FRAP
Rule 26(a)(1)(C)?

4) Did the lower court(s) abuse its/their discretion when it/they
failed/refused to adjudicate the merits of Petitioner's 59(e), when
he presented: A) facts showing the USDC failed to follow/abide by/
adhere to the plain, concise, express language in FRE 201; B) facts
straight out of the record, that show his claim AGAINST AUSA-Ms
Aisha Saleem, has never been adjudicated on its merits -
"restatement" of the claim is NOT any type of adjudication for
double jeopardy purposes; C) facts showing that Ms Saleem has
remained completely silent and has NEVER BEEN ORDERED/COMPELLED
to defend herself, by ANY court?

Whether an individual who does not have an Appointment Affidavit and has not taken the Oath of Office can become a civil servant/Assistant United States Attorney