No. 21-7901
Richard Coleman v. North Carolina, et al.
IFP
Tags: anti-pro-se-bias civil-rights due-process equal-protection first-amendment fourteenth-amendment free-speech judicial-overreach obstruction-of-justice pro-se-bias seventh-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FourthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether judges judging judges in cases in which one party is not represented results in pro se litigants being victims of judicial criminal acts - those acts so beyond that which the public expects of its judges -- judicial overreach, trespass, obstruction of justice, abuses of power, and anti -pro se bias, in turn violating the pro se party 's First Amendment right to a fair and impartial adjudication of his grievance, his Seventh Amendment right to a trial by jury, and his 14th Amendment right to receive to equal protection of the laws?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether judges judging judges in cases in which one party is not represented results in pro se litigants being victims of judicial criminal acts
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-04-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2022)
Attorneys
Richard Coleman
Richard Coleman — Petitioner