Whether the Fifth Circuit improperly decided Petitioner's Motion for a Certificate of Appealability on the merits of his § 2255 petition rather than engaging in the proper threshold inquiry set by this Court's precedent, and whether reasonable jurists could debate whether Petitioner made the necessary showing to reopen his § 2255 motion by way of his Rule 60(b) motion, warranting a Certificate of Appealability.

Whether the Fifth Circuit improperly decided a motion for a certificate of appealability on the merits of a § 2255 petition rather than engaging in the proper threshold inquiry