(1) After the Supreme Court of Nevada reversed the did the Court Order remanding the petitioner new Amendments Fire, Six, and Fourteen?

(2) Did the Supreme Court of Nevada conclude erroneously that the Eighth Judicial District Court did not err in finding that the petitioner abandoned his vehicle, and that the "abandoned property [is] not subject to First Amendment protections" as a result.

(3) Did the Supreme Court of Nevada err when it concluded that the petitioner was not prejudiced by cumulative prosecutorial misconduct?

Whether the Supreme Court of Nevada erred when it concluded that the petitioner was not prejudiced by cumulative error after the district court abandoned its initial indictment and the petitioner was reindicted