No. 21-7897

Barry Slakman v. Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-05-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process ex-post-facto parole sentencing standing statutory-interpretation takings
Latest Conference: 2022-06-23
Question Presented (from Petition)

interpretation and application of an ex post facto violation within the context of parole eligibility statutes, such as in initial parole eligibility, but now to exclude the practices and rules used by the state agency to actually determine parole eligibility as applied to petitioner's incarceration where they were retroactively applied to him as compared to statutes in effect at the time of petitioner's crime and sentencing.

Whether a Complaint under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure can overcome a dismissal under F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) complaint on longer has an assumption of correctness of factual allegations, and whether a Complaint is becoming judgment in its details.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-the-court-has-misinterpreted-an-ex-post-facto-violation-within-the-context-of-parole

Docket Entries

2022-06-27
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-06-01
Waiver of right of respondent Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, et al. to respond filed.
2022-04-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2022)
2022-03-24
Application (21A542) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until April 27, 2022.
2022-03-16
Application (21A542) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 30, 2022 to April 27, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.

Attorneys

Barry Slakman
Barry Slakman — Petitioner
Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, et al.
Stephen John PetranyGeorgia Department of Law, Respondent