Barry Slakman v. Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, et al.
interpretation and application of an ex post facto violation within the context of parole eligibility statutes, such as in initial parole eligibility, but now to exclude the practices and rules used by the state agency to actually determine parole eligibility as applied to petitioner's incarceration where they were retroactively applied to him as compared to statutes in effect at the time of petitioner's crime and sentencing.
Whether a Complaint under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure can overcome a dismissal under F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) complaint on longer has an assumption of correctness of factual allegations, and whether a Complaint is becoming judgment in its details.
whether-the-court-has-misinterpreted-an-ex-post-facto-violation-within-the-context-of-parole