Question Presented (from Petition)
When a defendant files a motion to suppress, then raises a new argument to support suppression in the court of appeals, is the new argument waived absent a showing of good cause under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(c)(8), as five Circuits have held, or is the new argument reviewed, at a minimum, for plain error under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b), as four Circuits have held?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When a defendant files a motion to suppress, then raises a new argument to support suppression in the court of appeals, is the new argument waived absent a showing of good cause under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(c)(8), as five Circuits have held, or is the new argument reviewed, at a minimum, for plain error under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b), as four Circuits have held?
2022-08-24
Reply of petitioner Matthew Alexander, III filed. (Distributed)
2022-08-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-29
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2022-07-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 29, 2022.
2022-07-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 15, 2022 to July 29, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-06-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 15, 2022.
2022-06-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 15, 2022 to July 15, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-05-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 15, 2022)