No. 21-7846
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure discrimination due-process equal-protection exceptions indictment-amendment legal-discrimination state-court state-courts
Latest Conference:
2022-06-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the Due Process Clause tolerate invidious discrimination by way of a state court's denial of a well-established exception to the rule?
Is notice required when a state court converts a common-law matter into one governed by a stricter statutory demand?
Does the Constitution tolerate amendments to an indictment that broadens a criminal statute and makes a substantive change in identity of the offense(s)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Due Process Clause tolerate invidious discrimination by way of a state court's denial of a well-established exception to the rule?
Docket Entries
2022-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/16/2022.
2022-05-25
Waiver of right of respondent State of Ohio to respond filed.
2022-05-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2022)
Attorneys
Jose L. Arroyo-Garcia
Jose L. Arroyo-Garcia — Petitioner
State of Ohio
Seth Luxon Gilbert — Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, Respondent