Does an accused in a criminal case have a constitutional right to access the crime scene, where it is private property not under government control -- as the prosecution routinely does and as it did in this case - and, in Mr. Bullcoming's trial for arson, carjacking, kidnapping and murder, did the district court err in denying him access to the crime scene, a burned trailer in which nobody was living and that was unsecured?

Does an accused have a constitutional right to access a private crime scene?