Question I.
Do Justices owe a mandatory , non-discretionary,
equitable, conscience-based moral duty to themselves,
to all Federal Bar attorneys and to individual
unrepresented victims to entertain petitions relating
broad-based "deliberately planned, carefully executed
schemes " by attorneys to defraud?

Question II.
Do courts of appeal nationwide, including the Ninth
Circuit, exhibit a pattern and practice of refusing to
adjudicate EVERY issue presented by the Class of
disrespected, unrepresented litigants filing appeals
arising from the underlying institutionalized IRS
record falsification program, and from the open
support thereof by involved U.S. district judges?

Question III.
Did the involved District and Circuit Judges "abuse
their discretion " by refusing to adjudicate the
validity of the falsified Form 4340 Certificate
proffered by the Government and to determine
whether a signed summary record of assessment
exists?

Question IV.
Does such refusal/abuse of discretion constitute fraud
on the Court by the Court ?

Do Justices owe a mandatory, non-discretionary, equitable, conscience-based moral duty to entertain petitions relating to deliberately planned, carefully executed schemes by attorneys to defraud?