Daniel Casamayor v. United States
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
1. Should a writ of certiorari be granted to determine if in light of Rehaif v. United States, 139 S.Ct. 2191 (2019), if Casamayor 's indictment charge for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e) is still valid.
2. In light of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015) (Johnson II) and United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019) are Casamayor 's convictions for 18 U.S.C. § 924(o) (count 5); and using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to the crime of violence (count 1) and a drug trafficking crime (count 2), 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1)(a) and 2 (count 6) infirm.
Should a writ of certiorari be granted to determine if Casamayor's indictment for being a felon in possession of a firearm is valid in light of Rehaif v. United States