No. 21-7797
Michael G. Peters v. Texas Medical Board
Tags: administrative-law administrative-procedure agency-action breakdown-of-communication criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review right-to-counsel sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation substitute-counsel
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel requires courts to appoint substitute counsel when a defendant demonstrates a complete breakdown of communication with appointed counsel
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-05-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 6, 2022)
Attorneys
Michael G. Peters
Michael G. Peters — Petitioner