No. 21-7793

Leihinahina Sullivan v. United States District Court for the District of Hawaii

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-05-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-client-privilege civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process free-speech grand-jury-procedure pro-se-defendant prosecutorial-misconduct standing subpoena-abuse
Latest Conference: 2022-06-02
Question Presented (from Petition)

Due to the lack of vesources while pretvia\ inca rcevatca at Honolulu Fedeval Detention Cenky C'F De") L apologize for using recytled paper. Pencil, and my TRULINKS email to to dvatt this and inco rporahng United States Supreme Couvt docket * 21-6415 as it provides velahve Hanser ipts and documnis a Which led to tS Petihon for Writ of Cerhovari as my Prose Status was taken away by U.S. bistncl Court Judge J. Michaet Scalovight C"dudge seabight ") which ts the result of his ordernng my patent Psycho tne ra py records fom my treah A ' doctod, Psycniatvist ovev , my objechons.Sce Exhibit E Order and Lup Ce Det - GHS.

Qugshen #) Should the Assistant United States Atorney C'AUSAY) In 4 criminal case la able 4p order 'mal Court subpoenas , two months ™m advance , knowing there would be no tial, then producing fake grand Jury Subpoenas" fori those trial Couvt Sulopoenas , a Suter tugs to Qnitnue wveskgahing A Criminal delendant vesulring, in 5 piecem | indictments wihin~3 years, violation of pyo se ctendants be s& and \4th Amendment Conshtuthonal Rights: (See Lacy v. Mavicopa, AS Fad $46, 413-14, where the 4 Circuit Court of Appeals held tata prosccutoy who waprorery issued fake Subpoenas was not enttHed to absolute immunity).

Queshon #2 Should a distic Court' judge be able ty order sua spore: 4 pro se criminal defendants treatin paychiatvist pahent- Psychotherapy Over Criminal Aactendant's obycchen hen convually use those recovas against criminal defendant, revoking he pro 'status On Eeloruary 4, 2022 Céxhibit C Pp aBpyail in opposite of what Jattee v. Redmond, (Gis ust, 135 ed 2, 234, Wes 4. 1426(1445)) protected whine parent = psycho therapy privite e? : A

Queshon #3 \s at ructual evvor CEarclia v.Caliornia, *1? SS 806 ° 14%5)} when a distinct court judge vevokes a criminal detendan pre se Sis to veprcsent nersole dun sentenaing based on"... son) wdicahon that she simply coulda Pt and \d not follow wna required of ber, "So Yevoking 4 criminal deter da ere se oe based on what might ha ppen 7(Sec Exibit C Fe. 28

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified

Docket Entries

2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-04-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 6, 2022)

Attorneys

Leihinahina Sullivan
Leihinahina Sullivan — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent