No. 21-7771
James Lamar Strickland v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Tags: brady-disclosure criminal-procedure due-process fundamental-fairness ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prejudice-standard sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the court of appeals improperly applied the prejudice standard articulated by this Court in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), to the facts of the Petitioner's case (i.e., "the ultimate focus of inquiry must be on the fundamental fairness of the proceeding whose result is being challenged," see Strickland, 466 U.S. at 696).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals improperly applied the prejudice standard articulated by this Court in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-06
Waiver of right of respondent Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections to respond filed.
2022-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-04-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2022)
2022-04-04
Application (21A458) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until April 29, 2022.
2022-03-31
Application (21A458) to extend further the time from April 14, 2022 to April 29, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.
2022-02-28
Application (21A458) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until April 14, 2022.
2022-02-23
Application (21A458) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 15, 2022 to April 14, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
James Strickland
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Trisha Meggs Pate — Florida office of the Attorney General, Respondent