Randolph Ashford v. South Carolina
DueProcess
Was Petitioner's 5th, 6th, and 14th, Amendment Rights of the
U.S. Constitution, Due Process Rights violated, by the pro
cedural defects in the establishing of the indictment, not
being filed with the Clerk of Court, Prior to presentment to
the Grand Jury .
Was the Court of General Sessions, by the laws of the State/
Federal Constitution, legally indict Petitioner in the Court
of Common Pleas on April 2007 and May of 2007, Terms of Court.
Was the Court of General Sessions by the laws of the State/
Federal Constitution legally indict Petitioner in the Court
of Common Pleas in August, 2008 and September 2009, Terras of
Court .
Did the State of South Carolina, need to re-indict Petitioner,
after the not guilty verdict , for indictment No. 2007-GS-40-
1940, So that trial court could retain subject matter juris
diction.
Did Petitioner's indictment No. 2007-GS-40-020001 , need be re
submission to the grand jury for amendment.
Was Petitioner's 5th, 6th, and 14th, Amendment Rights of the U.S. Constitution, Due Process Rights violated