No. 21-7735

Erskin Bernard Perryman v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-04-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal-waiver appellate-waiver base-offense-level criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review minor-participant plea-agreement sentencing-guidelines sixth-circuit
Latest Conference: 2022-06-02
Question Presented (from Petition)

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals erroneously granted the Government's Motion to Dismiss and refused to address whether the trial court calculated the petitioner's guideline range correctly when it erroneously applied a base level of 34 points instead of the initially calculated base level of 14 points based on Section 2X1.1 of the USSG and refused to review the issue of whether the petitioner's sentencing guidelines should have been reduced by two points for his role as a minor participant.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the trial court calculated the petitioner's guideline range correctly

Docket Entries

2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-04-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 31, 2022)

Attorneys

Erskin Perryman
Sanford Allen SchulmanFederal Criminal Attorneys of Michigan, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent