1. Was Defense Counsel ineffective for failing to object to the states known use of false testimony in Petitioners trial. Violating his Constitutional Due process rights under the 6th Amendment.

2. Was the States known use of material false testimony in petitioner 's trial a violation of his Constitutional Due Process rights under the 14th Amendment.

3. Does the Ninth Circuit Courts interpretation of Strickland, that Defense Counsels failure to object to the states known use of material false testimony in the Petitioners trial, (falls within the wide range of professional conduct,) conflict with relevant decisions of this court and go against clearly established Federal law. Violating Petitioners Constitutional Due Process rights under the 6th and 14th Amendments.

Was Defense Counsel ineffective for failing to object to the states known use of false testimony in Petitioners trial, violating his Constitutional Due process rights under the 6th Amendment