No. 21-7726
Michael Charles Sartin v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certiorari CJA-plan criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-procedure misinformation post-conviction-relief wilkins-precedent wilkins-v-united-states writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-02
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether misinformation about the timeframe for seeking
certiorari in violation of a lower court's CJA plan entitles a defendant to
a GVR consistent with Wilkins v. United States, 441 U.S. 468 (1979).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether misinformation about the timeframe for seeking certiorari in violation of a lower court's CJA plan entitles a defendant to a GVR consistent with Wilkins v. United States, 441 U.S. 468 (1979)
Docket Entries
2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-03-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 27, 2022)
Attorneys
Michael Sartin
Brandon Creighton Sample — Brandon Sample PLLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent